Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perampasan Kendaraan Bermotor Oleh Debt Collector Dalam Praktek Leasing di Indonesia (Studi Putusan No. 176/Pid.B/2018/PN. Lbo)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59582/sh.v19i01.1479Kata Kunci:
Crimes of Robbery, Vehicles, Debt Collectors, LeasingAbstrak
This study aims to determine 1) the legal analysis of the criminal act of unilateral confiscation of motor vehicles by debt collectors in leasing practices in Indonesia (Study of Decision No. 176/Pid.B/2018/PN. Lbo). 2) the legal responsibility of leasing companies for the criminal act of unilateral confiscation of motor vehicles carried out by debt collectors in leasing practices in Indonesia (Study of Decision No. 176/Pid.B/2018/PN. Lbo). This research method uses a normative legal approach. The type of data used is secondary data. Secondary data is data obtained through literature studies. The secondary data of this study are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The data collection technique is carried out through literature studies. The data analysis technique used is qualitative analysis. Qualitative data analysis because it is integrated with the activities of data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusions from research results. The results of the study indicate that the study shows that the decision Number 176 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN Lbo, the taking of motor vehicles by debt collectors without the consent of the debtor, without a legal execution procedure, and accompanied by elements of coercion or threats, fulfills the elements of a criminal act as regulated in Article 365 of the Criminal Code (theft with violence) or Article 368 of the Criminal Code (extortion), depending on the modus operandi and legal facts in the trial. This confirms that the action is not just a matter of civil default, but has entered the criminal realm. Leasing companies can be held legally responsible as an extension of the financing company based on the principle of vicarious liability, the provisions of Article 1367 of the Civil Code for unlawful acts committed by debt collectors as long as they carry out their duties. Decision No. 176 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN Lbo shows that the pretext of using a third party does not eliminate the company's legal responsibility. If a debt collector commits an unlawful act in the process of billing or repossessing a vehicle, the leasing company can be held accountable either criminally, civilly or administratively and is liable under consumer protection law.
Referensi
Buku :
Ahmad, Suryana. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.
Hendrojono. (2015). Kriminologi Pengaruh Perubahan Masyarakat Dan Hukum. 2015. Jakarta: Srikandi,
Moeljatno. (2018). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Muchtar, Masrudi. (2013). Debt Collector Dalam Optik Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Press.
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram. Unram Press,
Murdiyanto, R. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif.Yogjakarta: UPN Veteran Yogyakarta Press
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. (2013). Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Soekanto, S. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.
Saleh, Roeslan. (2013). Perbuatan Pidana Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Jakarta: Aksara Baru.
Zainudin, Ali. (2010). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Jurnal :
Amalia R, Rizky, and ’ Sulistyanta. “Tindak Pidana Perampasan Kendaraan Bemotor Oleh Debt Collector Dalam Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia.” Recidive?: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2020, pp. 109.
Anggrayni, Dea, Sriono Sriono, and Nimrot Siahaan. “Legal Consequences for Debt Collectors Exceeding Their Authority: A Case Study of PT Mega Central Finance Bagan Batu.” SIGn Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2025, pp. 97–109.
Chindy Wulandari, and Rozalinda. “Problematika Profesi Debt Collector Menurut Pandangan Islam.” Risalah Iqtisadiyah: Journal of Sharia Economic, Vol. 2, No. 2 , 2023, pp. 36–43.
Ermita, Yeni, and Dr. A. Djoko Sumaryanto. “Juridical Analysis of Law No. 42/1999 With Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/Puu-Xvii/2019 on Motor Vehicle Withdrawal By Defaulting Debtors.” Journal of Law Theory and Law Enforcemen. Vol. 3, No. 18 , 2024, pp. 22–33.
Ginting, Meilani Amanda Br, and Roida Nababan. “Analisis Yuridis Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Yang Dilakukan Oleh Perusahaan Leasing Dalam Proses Penarikan Kendaraan.” Journal of Accounting Law Communication and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2024, pp. 470–479.
Gunawan, H, D Guntara, and M Abas. “Tinjauan Yuridis Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pemerasan Dengan Ancaman Kekerasan Di Hubungkan Asas Kepastian Hukum (Studi Putusan ….” UNES Law Review, Vol . 6, No. 1, 2023, pp. 1168–1176.
Handayani, Prika, and Teddy Asmara. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Debt Collector Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Perampasan Dalam Kredit Bermasalah.” Hukum Responsif , Vol. 10, No. 2, 2019, pp. 55–66.
I Nyoman Suwardika, I Nyoman Suandika, and Ida Bagus Anggapurana Pidada. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Tugas Dan Fungsi Debt Collector Pasca Putusan MK.” Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara, Vol. 1, No. 4, 2023, pp. 165–186.
Junaidi, Andi Ilham, Bahrul Maani, Ruslan Abdul Gani, and Abdul Halim. “Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Penarikan Kendaraan Oleh Debt Collector (Studi Kasus Di Polresta Jambi).” Journal of Law, Education and Business, Vol. 3,Nno. 1, 2025, pp. 184–195.
Kaesmetan, Ruth Anggilani, Orpa Juliana Nubatonis, and Husni Kusuma Dinata. “Penarikan Paksa Kredit Kendaraan Yang Macet Oleh Pihak Leasing Yang Tidak Mempunyai Sertifikat Fidusia: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019.” Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2025, pp. 84–97.
Kusmadi, Rendi, Basodin, and La Ode Muhram. “Tinjauan Delik Penarikan Paksa Terhadap Barang Jaminan Fidusia (Studi Kasus Di PT. Adira Dinamika Multifinance Cabang Kota Kendari).” Jurnal Sultra Law Review. Vol. 2, No. 2, 2020, pp. 2716–2730.
Lesmana, Sri Jaya, and Rida Ristiyana. “Legal Counseling Regarding the Limits of Debt Collector and Leasing Authority in the Execution of Motor Vehicles.” Help: Journal of Community Service. Vol. 1, No. 4, 2025, pp. 246–255.
Maharani, Marsya Arviela, and Sulastri Sulastri. “Unilateral Withdrawal of the Fiduciary Security Object Without Any Default by the Debtor (Case Study of Decision No.36/Pdt.G.S/2023/PN Pdg).” Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities. Vol. 5, No. 5, 2025, pp. 3423–3431.
Moonti, Roy Marthen, Nurwita Ismail, Muslim A Kasim, Magister Hukum, Universitas Gorontalo, Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, and Universitas Gorontalo. “Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Debt Collector Dalam Melakukan Penarikan Kendraan Bermotor Secara Paksa Terhadap Konsumen.” Mahkamah: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2025, pp. 51–69.
Naufal Lufthi, A. D., D. A. R. Kurnianingsih Hutajulu, Samirah Novel, Widya Tri Lestari, and Dwi Aryanti Ramadhani. “Analisis Pelanggaran Hak-Hak Debitur Dan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Kasus LeasingKendaraan Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia.” Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), Vol. 2, No. 4, 2024, pp. 697–706.
Panjukang, Trione, Zulkarnain Hanafi, and Ibnu Subarkah. “Legal Analysis Of The Taking Of Fiduciary Objects By Debt Collectors Of Financial Institutions In Malang.” journal Widya Gama Law Review. Vol. 2, No. 1, 2025, pp. 24–36.
Perwitasari, Rina, Sigid Suseno, and Ijud Tajudin. “Analisis Yuridis Pengambilan Secara Paksa Kendaraan Debitur Yang Wanprestasi Oleh Perusahaan Leasing Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Ppu-Xvii/2019 Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, Vol. 2, No. 2 , 2021, pp. 1-16
Qurrota Aina, Luthfia, and Dini Dewi Heniarti. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penarikan Kendaraan Konsumen Secara Paksa Ditinjau Dengan Pasal 368 KUHP.” Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2022, pp.119–126.
Rohman, Abd, and Rusdianyo Sesung. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Debt Collector Yang Melakukan Pengambilan Kendaraan Bermotor Objek Jaminan Kredit.” Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam. Vol. 20, No. 2, 2018, pp. 49–75.
Rusyuandi, Faisal, Pristika Handayani, Rizki Tri Bhakti, and Rahmad Sukri. “Tinjauan Yuridis Kekuatan Hukum Penarikan Paksa Jaminan Fidusia Oleh Leasing Melalui Debt Collector Ditinjau Dari Undang- Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 18/Puu-Xvii/2019, Tentang Prosedur Penarika.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (JIH), Vol. 3, No. 1, 2024, pp. 21–30.
Saihaan, Samgar, and Sunarmi Sunarmi. “Forcible Seizure Of Motor Vehicles Due To Default On Consumer Financing Payments.” International Journal of Nusantara Law & Policy, Vol.1, No. 2., 2023, pp. 44–51.
Salim, Afifuddin, Ahmad Assyura, and Abd Mukhsin. “Criminal Acts of Threats by Debt Collectors Against Debtors in the Per- Spective of the Criminal Code and Islamic Criminal Law.” Journal Legal Brief , Vol. 13, No. 5, 2024, pp. 1215–1228.
Sangap, Sanggap MS. “A Legal Analysis of Legal Protection for Consumers Regarding the Withdrawal Process with Fiduciary Guarantee.” Journal International Of Officium Nobile Vol. 1, No. 5, 2025,pp. 201–213.
Sihombing, Krisna P, Hisar Siregar, and Jinner Sidauruk. “Analysis of Legal Protection against Buyers of Leasing Objects (Study of Law Number 42 of 1999 Concerning Fiduciary Guarantees).” Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2025, pp. 813–824.
Sunardi, Sunardi, Budi Parmono, and Moh Afifuddin. “The Role Of Debt Collector Services In Withdrawal Of Fiduciary Collateral In Financing Companies (Case Study on Finance in the City of Kediri).” Journal International Significance of Notary, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2023, pp. 116–132.
Suryono, Kelik Endo, and guruh Riona putraras Putra. “Eksekusi Sepihak Oleh Perusahaan Leasing Menggunakan Debt Collector Terhadap Obyek Jaminan Fidusia.” Jurnal Widya Pranata Hukum, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2020, 1–17.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan :
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Pasal 365 tentang pencurian dan kekerasan.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Pasal 368 KUHP tentang pemerasan dan Perampasan
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Pasal 55 KUHP tentang penyertaan (pertanggungjawaban pihak leasing jika terbukti memberi perintah).
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Pasal 1313-1338 tentang perjanjian, Pasal 1365 tentang perbuatan melawan hukum.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019.
Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan
POJK Nomor 35/POJK.05/2018
Internet
Bamby. “Aksi Perampasan Mobil Oleh Debt Collector Di Halim, Polisi Tegaskan Ada Unsur Pidana.” Radar Jakarta. Last modified 2025. https://radarjakarta.id/2025/06/16/aksi-perampasan-mobil-oleh-debt-collector-di-halim-polisi-tegaskan-ada-unsur-pidana/.
Gabriella, Michelle. “Polisi Akan Pidanakan Debt Collector Yang Rampas Kendaraan Warga Di Jalan.” Tempo. Last modified 2025. https://www.tempo.co/hukum/polisi-akan-pidanakan-debt-collector-yang-rampas-kendaraan-warga-di-jalan-1493783.
PANDUAN PENULISAN JURNAL 
TUTORIAL REGISTRASI DAN SUBMIT JURNAL 
